Home Today The Instances newspaper apologises to CAGE, pays £30,000 damages

The Instances newspaper apologises to CAGE, pays £30,000 damages


UK newspaper had falsely prompt advocacy group and its worker, a former Guantanamo prisoner, supported a homicide suspect.

London, United Kingdom – The Instances has agreed to pay £30,000 ($40,000) in damages to CAGE for falsely suggesting the advocacy group supported a homicide suspect.

On June 20, Khairi Saadallah killed two males in a stabbing assault in Studying, southeast England.

5 days later, The Instances, a number one British newspaper, mentioned CAGE and its outreach director Moazzam Begg have been “excusing his actions by reference to failings by the police and others”.

CAGE campaigns towards the injustices of the “warfare on terror” and requires due course of. Begg is a British citizen who was held within the US-run army jail Guantanamo Bay, with out cost, for nearly three years till he was launched in 2005.

In its apology on Friday, The Instances mentioned: “[We] wrongly said that they refused to touch upon their involvement with the suspect. In truth, whereas they commented on police and media response to the assault, they’d no involvement with the suspect.

“We apologise to CAGE and Mr Begg for these errors and for the misery brought about, and now we have agreed to pay them damages and authorized prices.”

CAGE mentioned it would use the damages paid to “expose state-sponsored Islamophobia and people complicit with it within the press”.

Begg mentioned the story was an instance of media protection that aimed to “perpetuate a story that demonises Muslims who search justice and accountability from the state” and “make enormous income”.

Miqdaad Versi of the Muslim Council of Britain welcomed the transfer, saying the paper had beforehand been pressured to apologise and pay damages for different deceptive articles about British Muslims.

Zillur Rahman, the solicitor who represented CAGE and Begg, mentioned he was “delighted” with the end result.

“£30,000 is a considerable sum of damages for an article that was on-line for lower than 24 hours … It exemplifies the gravity of the allegations and supplies the vindication to which CAGE and Mr Begg are entitled.

“It additionally demonstrates that the media can’t publish defamatory articles and assume that eradicating them from their web sites and publishing insufficient corrections will allow them to keep away from legal responsibility for these libels.”


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here